DOT AI Activation Points

Designing AI Activation Points for Student Learning Support

Role
Time
Client
Team
Product Designer, Project Manager, Prompt Engineer
Feb 2025 - Aug 2025
Open Learning Intiative & REAL CHEM
Ashley Xu,
Tingyue Cui,
Tracy Ciou,
Lily Lee,
Sherry Li
Role
Product Designer, Project Manager, Prompt Engineer
Time
Feb 2025 - Aug 2025
Client
Open Learning Intiative & REAL CHEM
Team
Ashley Xu,
Tingyue Cui,
Tracy Ciou,
Lily Lee,
Sherry Li

Overview

This 7-month capstone project was a collaboration with the Open Learning Initiative (OLI), an open-source platform that applies learning science and technology to improve student outcomes. Within OLI's REAL CHEM course, our goal was to make AI support more visible, timely, and useful — helping students get help at the moment it matters, without interrupting their learning flow.

Although DOT (Digital Online Tutor) was already embedded throughout the course, students often overlooked it or encountered it at the wrong moment. As the team's Product Designer and Prompt Engineer, I designed DOT AI Activation Points — a contextual prompting system that surfaces DOT at key learning moments. I defined the activation strategy across three levels, shaped prompt behavior using learning science principles, designed student-facing interaction patterns, and built reusable UI components for the DOT conversation experience. I also designed onboarding materials to help students understand how and when to use AI support. Validated with 373 REAL CHEM 1 students in Summer 2025, the system raised DOT interaction from 44% to 80.4% and scored ~85 on the System Usability Scale.

Outcome

The project involves

AI Prompts Launched

79
+

Contextual AI prompts drove 941 interactions across 373 students in Summer 2025 REAL CHEM.

DOT AI Awareness

125
%

Increased in DOT awareness through onboarding and contextual prompt strategies.

Interaction Rate

+
36
pp

DOT interaction rate increased from 44% to 80.4% after activation.

SUS Score

85
/100

373 SUmmer 2025 Real Chem Students

Problem

We observed that students often needed help but weren't seeking it at the right moment, which led to low engagement with support overall. That shaped our initial hypothesis: If support became easier to access in the learning moment, engagement might improve.

We considered two directions, then moved forward with DOT as an in-course AI tutor — it could provide contextual support directly inside the learning flow. Since it already knew what page the student was on, students could ask page-specific questions without reconstructing context somewhere else.

Plan A

Traditional Support

Q&A · quizzes · instruction

Plan B

DOT: In-course AI Tutor

Contextual support within the learning flow

However, When we tested this with 15 students, we found that many still overlooked it because it remained a passive icon in the bottom-right corner, and students still had to initiate the interaction themselves.

How might we design AI support that reaches students at the right moment, without interrupting the learning flow?

Design Solution

🔵

Page Level

DOT activates on a student's first visit to a page, orienting them before they begin.

🟢

Paragraph Level

DOT appears below a specific paragraph when the student clicks its AI icon — targeted support on a single concept.

🔴

Activity Level

DOT activates at key activity moments, such as an incorrect answer or a hint request — where students are most likely stuck.

3 Levels of Activation

Page Level Activation

DOT activates when a student visits the page for the first time
DOT Activated

Activity Level Activation

DOT activates when a student reaches a key activity moment, such as answering incorrectly or requesting a hint
DOT Activated

Paragraph Level Activation

DOT activates when a student clicks the AI icon next to a specific paragraph
DOT Activated

Behind the iteration

How does an author add prompt?

Authoring Page Level Trigger

Authoring Activity Level Trigger

Authoring Paragraph Level Trigger

If prompts are shaping the student experience, what makes a prompt effective in this system?

Prompt Logic

We grounded prompt design in real learning difficulties rather than generic AI writing. We worked with a chemistry expert to identify where students were likely to get stuck, then translated those sticking points into targeted activation logic and prompt behavior.

That meant prompts weren’t one-size-fits-all. Each one was tied to a specific learning challenge and shaped by learning science principles, like guiding reasoning, surfacing misconceptions, or prompting reflection.

01

Identified real student sticking points with a chemistry expert

02

Translated each learning difficulty into a targeted activation and prompt

03

Shaped prompt behavior with learning science principles

How do we define an effective prompt?

Design Component System

Retrospective

If we had more time, there are two things I’d want to test next. First, I’d want to understand which activation moments drive the most meaningful engagement, not just the most clicks. Second, I’d want to compare prompts more deeply in terms of trust and reasoning quality.

The biggest takeaway for me is that this project taught me to think about AI as behavior design, not just answer generation. I turned AI from a passive feature into a workflow, and built a more scalable intervention model through timing, prompts, and UI.

View More Projects

Producia

VIEW

Phipps

VIEW

PLUS UNO

VIEW